Methods for selecting and scaling seismic records for time response analysis

Authors

  • Claudio Oyarzo Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21703/0718-2813.2009.5.3679

Keywords:

seismic standard, time-history analysis, record selection, record scaling, Chilean carthquakes

Abstract

This article presents a critical analvsis of the recommendations for time-history analvsis contained in the Chilean standard for seismic design of industrial facilities (NCh 2369 Of2004). For this purpose, a method for the selection of carthquake records to be used in time-history analysis is presented. In addition, this article presents the results of a comparative study of the record scaling methods proposed by the European, North American, and New Zealand standards. The differences between these methods and their effects on the structural response of a single degree of freedom system are identified. Some recommendations to improve the Chilean standardare obtained from these studies.

References

ASCE (2007). ASCE 41-06. Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., xvi, 410.

Baker,J. and Cornell,A. (2006). Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 35, 1077-1095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.571

Bommer, J. J. and Acevedo, A. B. (2004). The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 8, 43-91 Carr, A. J. (2004). Ruaumoko —Aprogram for inelastic time-history analysis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350521

Canterbury, New Zcaland

Comartin, C., Niewiaroski, R. and Rojahn, C. (1996). ATC-40 Seismic evaluation and retrofit of conerete buildings. SSC 96-01, Aplied Technology Council, CA, USA

Comell, C. (2005). On earthquake record selection for nonlinear dynamic analysis. The Esteva Symposium, Mexico, August 2005

COSMOS (1999). COSMOS VirtualData Center. http://db.cosmos- eq.org/scripts/default.plx (01.May.2009)

Dhakal, R., Singh, S. and Mander, J. (2007). Effectiveness of earthquake selection and scaling procedure method in New DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.40.3.160-171

Zealand. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 40(3), 160-171

ECS (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Europcan Committec for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium

EQC New Zealand and GNS Science. (2004). GeoNet Strong Motion Data. ftp://ftp.gconct.org.nz/strong/processed (01.May.2009)

Iervolino, 1. and Cornell, A. (2005). Record selection for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures. Earthquake Spectra 21(3), 685- 713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1990199

INN Chile. (2003). Diseño sismico de estructuras e instalaciones industrial NCh 2369 Of 2003." Instituto Nacional de Normalización, Santiago, Chile

Otani, S. (1981). Hysteresis models of reinforced concrete for earthquake response analysis. Journal of Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo 36(2), 407-441

Oyarzo-Vera, C., Fleming, R., McVerry,G. and Ingham,J. (2009). Seismic zonation and default suite of ground motion records for time-history analysis in New Zealand. New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, 3-5 April 2009

Oyarzo-Vera,C. and Chouw,N. (2008). Comparison of record scaling methods proposed by standards currently applied in different countrics. /41h World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 12-17 October 2008

PEER Center. (2005). PE http://peer.berkeley.cdu/nga/index.html :R NGA Data basc (01.May.2009)

SNZ (2004). NZS 1170.5:2004 - Structural design actions. Earthquake actions. Standards New Zcaland, Wellington, New Zealand

Somerville, P. G., Smith, N. F., Graves, R. W. and Abrahamson, N. A. (1997). Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismological Research Letters 68(1), 199- 222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.199

Stirling, M., McVerry, G. and Berryman, K. (2002). A new seismic hazard model for New Zealand. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 92(5), 1878-1903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010156

Downloads

Published

2009-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Methods for selecting and scaling seismic records for time response analysis. (2009). Obras Y Proyectos, 5, 18-25. https://doi.org/10.21703/0718-2813.2009.5.3679