Comparison of the Crank Nicholson and generalized α methods applied to the groundwater flow equation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21703/0718-2813.2010.7.3721

Keywords:

discretization, groundwater flow, Crank Nicholson and α-generalized methods, finite element method

Abstract

This article is a revision and comparison of two numeric methods used to solve the transient part of the problem of flow through a saturated, porous medium. The transient part of the fundamental flow equation in a porous medium in one dimension is solved using two temporary integration schemas: the Crank Nicholson method and the generalized α-method. The spatial component of the equation is discretized using the finite element method. Even though both methods are traditionally stable, the precision of the methodology of the Crank Nicholson depends on the existing relationship between the Δx size of the discretized elements and the size Δt of the flow of time (albeit mostly dependent on the size of Δt), while in the α-generalized method it depends additionally of three parameters exclusive of this schema. The precision of both methods is compared for different values of Δx and Δt. Additionally, for the alpha method, the influence of two of the three parameters in the precision of the solution is analyzed.

References

Bear, J. (1972). Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Elsevier, New York

Chung, J. and Hulbert, G. M. (1993). A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics with Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized- α Method. Journal of Applied Mechanics

Crank, J. and P. Nicholson (1974), A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat conduction type. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 43: 50–67

Hilbert, H. M., Hughes, T. J. R. and Taylor, R.I. (1977). Improved Numerical Dissipation for Time Integration Algorithms in Structural Dynamics. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.5

Hughes T.J. R. (1987). The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis. Prentice – Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

Jansen, K. E., Whiting, C. H. and Hulbert, G. M. (2000). A Generalized-α Method For Integrating The Filtered Navier-Stokes Equations With A Stabilized Finite Element Method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 190:305-319

Videla, D. (2010). Comparación de 2 métodos numéricos, método α-generalizado y Crank Nicholson, aplicados a la ecuación de flujo y transporte de contaminantes en medios porosos. Memoria para optar al título de Ingeniero Civil, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Chile

Downloads

Published

2010-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Comparison of the Crank Nicholson and generalized α methods applied to the groundwater flow equation. (2010). Obras Y Proyectos, 7, 51-56. https://doi.org/10.21703/0718-2813.2010.7.3721