Parameter uncertainty methods in evaluating a lumped hydrological model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-28132012000200004Keywords:
HSPF, Parameter uncertainty, Monte Carlo simulation, Harr’s point estimation method, Uncertainty bounds of streamflow simulationsAbstract
Water resources modelers face the challenge of dealing with numerous uncertainties due to the lack of knowledge of the natural systems, numerical approaches used in modeling (equations, parameters, structures, solutions), and field data collected to set up and evaluate models. Propagation of parameter uncertainty into model results is a relevant topic in environmental hydrology. Uncertainty analyses improve assessment of hydrological modeling. There is a need in modern hydrology of developing and testing uncertainty analysis methods that support hydrological model evaluation. In this research the propagation of model parameter uncertainty into streamflow model results is evaluated. The Hydrological Simulation Program – FORTRAN (HSPF) supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency was evaluated using hydroenvironmental data from the Luxapallila Creek watershed located in Mississippi and Alabama, USA. The uncertainty bounds of model outputs were computed using the Monte Carlo simulation and Harr’s point estimation methods. Analysis of parameter uncertainty propagation on streamflow simulations from 12 HSPF parameters was accomplished using 5,000 Monte Carlo random samples and 24 Harr selected points for each selected parameter. The comparison showed that Harr’s method could be an appropriate initial indicator of parameter uncertainty propagation on streamflow simulations, particularly for hydrology models with several parameters.
References
Al-Abed, N.A. and Whiteley, H.R. (2002). Calibration of the hydrological simulation program fortran (HSPF) model using automatic calibration and geographical information systems. Hydrological Process 16, 3169-3188.
Alarcon V.J., McAnally, W., Diaz-Ramirez, J., Martin, J. and Cartwright, J. (2009). A hydrological model of the Mobile River watershed, Southeastern USA. AIP Conference Proceedings 1148, 641-645.
Albek, M., Öğütveren, Ü.B. and Albek, E. (2004). Hydrological modeling of Seydi Suyu watershed (Turkey) with HSPF. Journal of Hydrology 285, 260-271.
Beven, K. and Binley, A. (1992). The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes 6(3), 279-298.
Bicknell, B.R., Imnoff, J.C., Jobes, T.H. and Donigian, A.S. (2001). Hydrological Simulation Program – Fortran HSPF version 12, User’s Manual. Prepared for AQUA TERRA Consultants Mountain View, California, in co-operation with Water Resources Discipline U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia , and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Athens, Georgia.
Binley, A.M., Beven, K.J., Calver, A. and Watts, L.G. (1991). Changing responses in hydrology: assessing the uncertainty in physically based model predictions. Water Resources Research 27(6), 1253-1261.
Butts, M.B., Payne, J.T., Kristensen, M. and Madsen, H. (2004). An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modelling uncertainty for streamflow simulation. Journal of Hydrology 298, 242-266.
Carpenter, T.M. and Georgakakos, K.P. (2004). Impacts of parametric and radar rainfall uncertainty on the ensemble streamflow simulations of a distributed hydrologic model. Journal of Hydrology 298, 202-221.
Christian, J.T. and Baecher, G.B. (2002). The point-estimate method with large numbers of variables. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 26, 1515-1529.
Diaz-Ramirez, J.N., Perez-Alegria, L.R. and McAnally. W.H. (2008). Hydrology and sediment modeling using HSPF/BASINS in a tropical island watershed. Transactions of the ASABE 51(5), 1555-1565.
Diaz-Ramirez, J.N., McAnally, W.H. and Martin, J.L. (2011). Analysis of hydrological processes applying the HSPF model in selected watersheds in Alabama, Mississippi, and Puerto Rico. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 27(6), 937-954.
Dilks, D.W., Canale, R.P. and Meier, P.G. (1992). Development of Bayesian Monte Carlo techniques for water quality model uncertainty. Ecological Modelling 62, 149-162.
Donigian, A.S., Bicknell, B.R. and Imhoff, J.C. (1995). Hydrological Simulation Program – FORTRAN (HSPF). In: Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. Chapter 12, V.P. Sigh (editor). Water Resources Publications.
Duan, Z., Diaz, J.N., Martin, J.L. and McAnally, W.H. (2008). Effects of land-use changes on Saint Louis Bay watershed modeling. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue 52, 117-124.
Georgakakos, K.P., Seo, D.J. Gupta, H., Schaake, J. and Butts, M.B. (2004). Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles. Journal of Hydrology 298, 222-241.
Gupta, H.V., Beven, K.J. and Wagener, T. (2005). Model Calibration and Uncertainty Estimation. In: Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences, M. Anderson (editor). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Haan, C.T. (2002). Statistical Methods in Hydrology. 2nd ed., Iowa State Press.
Harr, M.E. (1989). Probabilistic estimates for multivariate analysis. Applied Mathematical Modelling 13, 313-318.
Hayashi, S., Murakami, S., Watanabe, M. and Bao-Hua, X. (2004). HSPF simulation of runoff and sediment loads in the upper Changjiang River Basin, China. Journal of Environmental Engineering 130(7), 801-815.
Hummel, P., Kittle, J. and Gray, M. (2001). WDMUtil User’s Manual Version 2.0: A Tool for Managing Watershed Modeling Time-Series Data. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science and Technology and Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
Jia, Y. ( 2004). Robust Optimization for Total Maximum Daily Load Allocations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia.
Laroche, A., Gallichand, J., Lagacé, R. and Pesant, A. (1996). Simulating atrazine transport with HSPF in an agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Engineering 122(7), 622-630.
McAnally, W.H., Martin, J.L., Diaz, J.N., Duan, Z., Mancilla, C.A., Tagert, M.L., O’Hara, C. and Ballweber, J.A. (2006). Assimilating Remotely Sensed Data into Hydrologic Decision Support Systems: BASINS Evaluation. Department of Civil Engineering and GeoResources Institute, Mississippi State University, MS.
McIntyre, N., Wheater, H. and Lees, M. (2002). Estimation and propagation of parametric uncertainty in environmental models. Journal of Hydroinformatics 4(3), 177-197.
Melching, C.S. (1992). An improved first-order reliability approach for assessing uncertainties in hydrologic modeling. Journal of Hydrology 132, 157-177.
Melching, C.S. (1995). Reliability Estimation. In: Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Chapter 3, V.P. Sigh (editor). Water Resources Publications, Littleton, CO.
Metropolis, N. and Ulam, S. (1949). The Monte Carlo method. Journal of the American Statistical Association 44(247), 335-341.
Moore, L.W., Matheny, H., Tyree, T., Sabatini, D. and Klaine, S.J. (1988). Agricultural runoff modeling in a small west Tennessee watershed. Research Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 60(2), 242-249.
Morgan, M.G. and Henrion, M. (1990). Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Nasr, A., Bruen, M., Jordan, P., Moles, R., Kiely, G. and Byrne. P. (2007). A comparison of SWAT, HSPF and SHETRAN/GOPC for modelling phosphorus export from three catchments in Ireland. Water Research 41(5), 1065-1073.
Paul, S. (2003). Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL): Development and Evaluation of a New Classification Scheme for Impaired Waterbodies of Texas. Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University.
Refsgaard, J.C., and Henriksen, H.J. (2004). Modelling guidelines-terminology and guiding principles. Advances in Water Resources 27(1):71-82.
Refsgaard, J.C., van der Sluijs, J.P., Hojberg, A.L. and Vanrolleghem, P.A. (2007). Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - a framework and guidance. Environmental Modelling and Software 22, 1543-1556.
Rogers, C.C.M., Beven, K.J., Morris, E.M. and Anderson, M.G. (1985). Sensitivity analysis, calibration and predictive uncertainty of the institute of hydrology distributed model. Journal of Hydrology 81, 179-191.
Ronen, Y. (1988). The Role of Uncertainties. In: Uncertainty Analysis, Y. Ronen (ed.). CRC Press.
Rosenblueth, E. (1975). Point estimates for probability moments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 72(10), 3812-3814.
Singh, V.P. (1995). Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. Water Resources Publications.
Singh, V.P. and Woolhiser, D.A. (2002). Mathematical modelling of watershed hydrology. Journal of Hydrology Engineering 7(4), 270-292.
Singh, V.P. and Frevert, D.K. (2002). Mathematical Models of Large Watershed Hydrology. Water Resources Publications.
Sobol’, I.M. (1994). A Primer for the Monte Carlo Method. CRC Press.
Souid, M.A. (1999). Reliability of Rainfall-Runoff Models. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York.
Thiemann, M., Trosset, M., Gupta, H. and Sorooshian, S. (2001). Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models. Water Resources Research 37(10), 2521-2535.
Tung, Y.K. (1996). Uncertainty and Reliability Analysis. In: Water Resources Handbook, L.W. Mays (editor). McGraw-Hill.
Tung, Y.K. and Yen, B.C. (2005). Hydrosystems Engineering Uncertainty Analysis. McGraw-Hill.
USEPA US Environmental Protection Agency (2000). BASINS technical note 6: estimating hydrology and hydraulic parameters for HSPF. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/basins/docs/tecnote6.pdf. Accessed in November 2008.
USEPA US Environmental Protection Agency (2006). HSPFParm version 1.3 beta July 2002. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/OST/ftp/basins/HSPFParm/. Accessed in April 7, 2006.
USEPA US Environmental Protection Agency (2011). Better assessment science integrating point and nonpoint sources (BASINS) web site. Available at http://water.epa.gov/scitech/datait/models/basins/index.cfm. Accessed in November 2011.
USEPA US Environmental Protection Agency (2012). Flow calibration tutorial: calibration scenarios. Available at: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/datait/models/basins/scenario.cfm. Accessed in June 13, 2012.
Wagener, T., McIntyre, N., Lees, M.J., Wheater, H.S. and Gupta, H.V. (2003). Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfallrunoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis. Hydrological Processes 17(2), 455-476.
Wu, J. (2004). Water-Quality-Based BMP Design Approach and Uncertainty Analysis for Integrated Watershed Management. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia.
Zhang, H.X. and Yu, S.L. (2004). Applying the first-order error analysis in determining the margin of safety for total maximum daily load computations. Journal of Environmental Engineering 130(6), 664-673.
Yu, P.S., Yang, T.C. and Chen, S.J. (2001). Comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for a distributed rainfall-runoff model. Journal of Hydrology 244, 43-59.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
