A sliding block model to analyse the kinematic behaviour of soil landslides from the resultant forces of a limit equilibrium analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-28132020000100064

Keywords:

Landslide runout, Landslide velocity, Sliding block, Landslide kinematics, Viscosity, Movement equation, Finite difference method

Abstract

In this paper, a two-dimensional sliding block model–discretized in slices- is presented, in which the geometrical, mechanical and rheological variables of the landslide are considered in order to analyse the soil landslide kinematic behaviour. The movement of the sliding mass is presented as a system of adjacent blocks; the movement strength is given by the Coulombviscous rheological model, where the friction and viscous components are considered, represented by a parallel system of a slider and a damper, respectively. The movement equation of the model corresponds to a second order differential equation, which was solved by the finite difference method, obtaining an explicit equation to know the displacement, velocity and acceleration of each block. An algorithm was developed in MATLAB® software, where movement equations were programmed to obtain results of the sliding kinematics. With the algorithm developed it was possible to make a sensitivity analysis to the parameters of the model. This was implemented in the problem of the sliding block at infinity slope, where it was possible to know the influence of each of the parameters of the model. The model has also been applied to the Hiegaesi landslide occurred in Japan in 1998, where the kinematic behaviour has been analysed in the model, regarding the records reported. However, further research is needed in order to apply the published model for prediction of the kinematic behaviour of landslides due to different limitations discussed in this paper.

References

Angeli, M.G., Gasparetto, P., Menotti, R.M., Pasuto, A. and Silvano, S. (1996). A visco-plastic model for slope analysis applied to a mudslide in Cortina d’Ampezzo, Italy. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 29(3), 233-240.

Banco Mundial (2012). Análisis de la gestión del riesgo de desastres en Colombia. Un aporte para la construcción de políticas públicas. Vol. 1. Bogotá, Colombia.

Chen, H. and Lee, C.F. (2000). Numerical simulation of debris flows. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 37(1), 146-160.

Chen, H. and Lee, C.F. (2002). Runout analysis of slurry flows with Bingham model. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 128(12), 1032-1042.

Corominas, J., Moya, J., Ledesma, A., Lloret, A. and Gili, J.A. (2005). Prediction of ground displacements and velocities from groundwater level changes at the Vallcebre landslide (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain). Landslides 2, 83-96.

Crosta, G.B., Imposimato, S. and Roddeman, D.G. (2003). Numerical modelling of large landslides stability and runout. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 3(6), 523-538.

Cuomo, S. (2014). New advances and challenges for numerical modeling of landslides of the flow type. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 9, 91-100.

GB50021 (1995). Code for investigation of geotechnical engineering. National Standard of PRC. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

Glastonbury, J., Fell, R. and Mostyn, G.R. (2002). Report on the post-collapse behaviour of debris from rock slope failures. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Hungr, O. (1995). A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows, and avalanches. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 32(4), 610-623.

Hungr, O. (2009). Numerical modelling of the motion of rapid flow-like landslides for hazard assesment. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 13(4), 281-287.

Hungr, O., Leroueil, S. and Picarelli, L. (2014). The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides 11, 167-194.

Hunter, G. and Fell, R. (2003). Travel distance angle for “rapid” landslides in constructed and natural soil slopes. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 40(6), 1123-1141.

Johnson, A.M. (1970). Physical processes in geology: a method for interpretation of natural phenomena; intrusions in igneous rocks, fractures, and folds, flow of debris and ice. Freeman, Cooper & Company.

Keaton, J.K., Wartman, J., Anderson, S., Benoit, J., deLaChapelle, J., Gilbert, R. and Montgomery, D.R. (2014). The 22 March 2014 Oso Landslide, Snohomish County, Washington. Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance Association GEER-36, USA.

McDougall, S. (2017). Landslide runout analysis – current practice and challenges. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 54(5), 605-620.

Miao, T., Liu, Z., Niu, Y. and Ma, C. (2001). A sliding block model for the runout prediction of high-speed landslides. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 38(2), 217-226.

Mora, C. (2011). Contención de taludes en estado viscoplástico. Tesis de maestría, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.

Petley, D. (2012). Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology 40(10), 927-930.

van Asch, Th.W.J., van Beek, L.P.H. and Bogaard, T.A. (2007). Problems in predicting the mobility of slow-moving landslides. Engineering Geology 91, 46-55.

Wang, F.W., Sassa, K. and Wang, G. (2002). Mechanism of a long-runout landslide triggered by the August 1998 heavy rainfall in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Engineering Geology 63, 169-185.

Wang, X. (2008). Geotechnical analysis of flow slides, debris flows, and related phenomena. PhD thesis, University of Alberta, Canada.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A sliding block model to analyse the kinematic behaviour of soil landslides from the resultant forces of a limit equilibrium analysis. (2020). Obras Y Proyectos, 27, 64-77. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-28132020000100064