Seismic shear demands in columns of RC frames accounting for dynamic amplification effects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-28132019000200087

Keywords:

Reinforced concrete (RC), Seismic shear demands, Columns, Dynamic amplification

Abstract

This article presents a numerical study on the shear force demands suffered by columns of reinforced concrete (RC) frames subjected to seismic actions. The paper examines well established capacity-based design procedures which account for dynamic amplification effects via the dynamic magnification factor ων, which multiplies the static shear demands resulting from the development of the beam flexural strengths. It also reviews the prescriptions of the New Zealand Standard NZS3101, which requires ων = 1.3 for columns of intermediate storeys. Using the results of nonlinear dynamic analyses (NLDA) of a model representing one of the main directions of a 12-storey building structured with RC walls and special moment resisting frames designed per NCh433 and ACI318, the paper shows the calculated values of ων for different column types and storey level, as subjected to a set of 13 earthquake records. The results show that 1.0 < ων < 1.3 in the great majority of the cases, suggesting that the limit ων = 1.3 would be appropriate in this particular case. However, it cannot be considered a conservative upper bound in a conclusive way, because values as large as 1.6 were predicted in some of the cases. Acknowledging that no dynamic amplification effects are included in the calculation of the capacity-based shear demands for columns of frames according to ACI318 (current 2019 edition), it is proposed that the recommendation of NZS3101 (2006), which cover such effects, are included in the upcoming edition of the Chilean Standard NCh430.

References

ACI318 (2019). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary (ACI318M-19). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, USA.

ACI318 (2005). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary (ACI318M-05). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, USA.

ACI318 (1995). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary (ACI 318R-95). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, USA.

Andriono, T. and Park, R. (1986). Seismic design considerations of the properties of New Zealand manufactured steel reinforcing bars. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 19(3), 213-246.

AS/NZS1170.0 (2002). Structural design actions: Part 0. General principles. Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand.

Boore, D. and Bommer, J.J. (2005). Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options, and consequences. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 25(2), 93-115.

Carr, A.J. (2016). Ruaumoko user’s manual for the 2-dimensional version. Carr Research Limited, Christchurch, New Zealand.

DS61 (2011). Reglamento que fija el diseño sísmico de edificios y deroga decreto nº 117, de 2010. Decreto Supremo, Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo, Diario Oficial de la República de Chile, Nº 40.133, 8-12.

Goodsir, W.J., Paulay, T. and Carr, A.J. (1983). A study on the inelastic seismic response of reinforced concrete coupled frameshear wall structures. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 16(3), 185-200.

NCh433 (1996). Seismic design of buildings. Norma Chilena Oficial. Instituto Nacional de Normalización INN, Santiago, Chile (in Spanish).

NCh430 (2008). Hormigón armado – Requisitos de diseño y cálculo. Norma Chilena Oficial, Instituto Nacional de Normalización INN, Santiago, Chile.

NZS1170.5 (2004). Structural design actions: Part 5. Earthquake actions. Standards New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand.

NZS3101 (1995). Design of concrete structures. Standards New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand.

NZS3101 (2006). The design of concrete structures. Standards New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand.

Park, R. (1996). Explicit incorporation of element and structure overstrength in the design process. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, paper 2130.

Paulay, T. (1983). Deterministic seismic design procedures for reinforced concrete buildings. Engineering Structures 5(1), 79-86.

Paulay, T. (1996). Seismic design if concrete structures the present needs of societies. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, paper 2001.

Paulay, T. and Priestley, M.J.N. (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

Paulay, T. and Goodsir, W.J. (1986). The capacity design of reinforced concrete hybrid structures for multistorey buildings. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 19(1), 1-17.

Priestley, M.J.N., Kowalsky, M.J. and Calvi, G.M. (2007). Displacement-based seismic design of buildings. IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.

Quintana Gallo, P. (2018). Simple estimation of the maximum elastic roof displacement of a slender cantilever RC wall accounting for dynamic effects. Obras y Proyectos 23, 55-62.

Quintana Gallo, P. (2014). The nonlinear dynamics involved in the seismic assessment and retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings. PhD thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Quintana Gallo, P. (2008). Analytical evaluation of damage in a reinforced concrete building. MSc thesis, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, Chile (in Spanish).

Rudner, R. (1953). The scientist qua scientist makes value judgements. Philosophy of Science 20(1), 1-6.

Saiidi, M. and Sozen, M.A. (1979). Simple and complex models for nonlinear seismic response of reinforced concrete structures. Report UILU-ENG-79-2031, University of Illinois UrbanaChampaign, USA.

Trifunac, M.D. and Brady, A.G. (1975). On correlation of seismoscope response with earthquake magnitude and Modified Mercalli Intensity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65(2), 307-321.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-01 — Updated on 2021-12-10

Versions

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Seismic shear demands in columns of RC frames accounting for dynamic amplification effects. (2021). Obras Y Proyectos, 26, 87-99. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-28132019000200087 (Original work published 2019)